It’s time to think of our children…

It is less than a month now to Christmas. Metaphorically speaking, that’s the time of year when we hope that a child of hope will be born into this world, and the days will start to become lighter again, and the future brighter…

My biggest memory of 2008 will be this: that, back when the days were still long, in July of this year, in Norwich Quaker Meeting House, I got married.

It was, of course, lovely to see lots of my family and friends there: old people, young people, babes in arms. It was especially good to see those who will still be here after I am gone.

Everyone wants their kids to be OK. And their kids. And their kids too…

Think about this. You never want this to stop. Would it be OK if after you were gone your great-great-grandchildren all lived short, miserable lives and died excruciating or terrifying deaths? Of course it wouldn’t.

And so now I have to mention what we don’t tend to like to think about… The way we as a species live right now, the size of our ecological and carbon footprint, stamping down on the Earth… We are living off the future. Off our children’s inheritances…(Continues)

Visit to Bedford by Prospective Green Party MEP on Monday December 1st [Press note]

Cllr. Dr. Rupert Read, Prospective Green Party MEP for Eastern Region will be visiting Bedford on Monday 1st December as part of a tour of the six counties of the region ahead of the European Elections which take place in June next year
Cllr. Read will be meeting with local Greens and members of the public at 8.15am (until 9.15) at Bedford Central Bus Station. They will be leafletting bus passengers, and engaging in conversation about the Green Party’s plans to improve public transport services.
The Greens are mounting a strong campaign to gain an MEP in Eastern Region where they have steadily increased their number of Councillors to currently stand at 27. There are now Green Party Principal Authority Councillors in every county in Eastern Region.
Dr. Read said:
“Bedford is a town that could benefit greatly from improved public transport infrastructure to ease traffic problems and give people more choices about the way they travel. One of my top priorities, if I get elected next June, will be to shift some of the E.U.’s transport budget from climate-dangerous international mega-projects to more local public transport schemes that benefit local communities.”

Rackheath can’t be an eco-town if it depends on an NDR…

My answers to the Rackheath ‘eco-town’ consultation, for readers’ interest:
Question 1: What are your first impressions of the proposed design and do you have any suggestions for improvement?

The plans look first class but in reality Rackheath could only be considered an eco-town WITHOUT the NDR.   Transport within, to and from the community should be based around public transport and safe walking and cycling routes.

Question 2: Do you have any thoughts on how residents and the current community could benefit from the proposals?

Being part of an exciting new development and benefiting from clean air and top quality public transport.

Question 3: What can be done to make the whole of Rackheath a low carbon community?

There are numerous building techniques available to make existing housing stock low carbon and these should be used extensively.  An easy quick move would be to provide insulation to all existing buildings.  Wind and solar power power should also be harnessed where possible. 

Question 4: Please let us know if you have more thoughts, ideas or views on our proposals.

Though I wholeheartedly agree with the concept of eco-towns I would have to question these proposals if they included the building of an NDR as that would wipe out any carbon saving gains for many years to come.  Massive reduction in car journeys and good public transport provision has to be one of the key features of the plan.

British politics — the current state of play

The Conservatives are in serious trouble — their underlying deregulatory narrative has been totally blown out of the water by recent events.
But that still leaves Labour in big trouble too — for their underlying narrative was barely different. Brown was a high-priest of light-touch financial regulation: it is frankly sickening now to see him posturing as a saviour.
…It is deeply premature to think that there has been a death of New Labour.
For Brown isn’t doing enough to save us from financial and economic ruin. As I have argued repeatedly (see various posts below), this government’s continued neo-liberal instincts are still hobbling it at almost every turn. Still, LIBOR is high; still, small businesses (and large ones!) are going to the wall without access to credit lines; still, the banks are being allowed to operate at arm’s length… There is a pitiful failure of nerve in the government, a pitiful failure to grasp the historic opportunity here, which a Roosevelt would not fail to grasp.
And that’s only the government’s failure on the financial and economic front. Its failure on the environmental front is far more reckless and complete. The pre-budget report recklessly promotes the trashing of our environment for uncertain short-term economic gain. This is an utter and heart-rending (when one thinks of those who will suffer from it) failure/absence of vision.
We need the banks democratically controlled (or re-mutualised), (and) we need a Green New Deal. ( ) These are what the Green Party is calling for. By contrast, Labour’s sad little offerings will not fundamentally change its fortunes — still less, those of our civilisation, which, on current form and with current trajectory, is heading fast for the rocks, no matter whether Brown or Cameron ‘pilots’ our portion of it.

My latest OneWorld column
Last Sunday, I was privileged to attend a large ecumenical memorial service at Norwich Cathedral, to honour the too-many precious men, women and children killed in road crashes. This event was part of the World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims.

World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims creates a link between victims of road crashes, who deserve to be alive today to fulfil their hopes and dreams instead of having been killed, prematurely and violently. Witnessing the tears during the service, and speaking with people afterwards, I got a strong sense of how the lives also of those closest to road traffic victims have been traumatically affected by their loss. One of the vital purposes of an organisation like RoadPeace is to bring together those close to those who have been killed on the roads. Because losing a loved one on the roads can bring a terrible sense of isolation. There just isn’t the same kind of network of support that exists for, for instance, widows of members of the armed forces.

As part of the act of remembrance on Sunday, at one point in the service there was an opportunity to write the names of those killed in crashes on an Oak Leaf card, which was placed at the foot of the Easter Resurrection Candle. I went up and placed a card, as did all too many others in the cathedral. I was remembering several people killed or seriously injured in car-crashes, but especially my great-uncle Harold, a lovely funny old fellow, who was cruelly ripped from us and from his wife, my great-aunt Margaret, at a point when they were hugely enjoying their retirement together. He was knocked down by a van-driver while out walking to the corner shop one evening near to his home.

I feel passionately about those needlessly killed in the annual car-nage on our roads. And so I am in direct sympathy with the central suggestions that RoadPeace make: To remember and to reflect on the scale of the disaster and the ongoing suffering of victims’ families.

It is vital to remember that this disaster is man-made and needs us to correct it. And we need also to raise awareness of the urgent need for improved post-care and support for the bereaved, who seem largely forgotten by the justice system and modern society. We need to commit to a culture of road safety, respect, accountability and responsibility towards every road user – and the importance of a more serious response to law-breaking on our roads. Cars are potentially deadly weapons: as with knives, their abuse should not be tolerated at all.

Should we consider for instance, as they are introducing in Spain, a strongly-enforced 50mph limit for some or all major roads where the limit is at present 60 mph? Including of course country roads where there is a 60 mph limit at present, unbelievably: as these roads present the most hazards and where walkers, cyclists and motorcyclists, the most vulnerable road users, have to face the death penalty on the roads with speed limits that are un-survivable in a collision – and which are routinely broken with widespread tolerance of speeding. So we should avoid always using terms like ‘accident’ or ‘tragedy’, which suggest something God-given or unavoidable. Too many car crashes – and their aftermaths – are the result of thoughtlessness or selfishness or sometimes even worse, on the part of both individual motorists or of the authorities.

Department of Transport statistics for 2006 show that a child is injured or killed on UK roads every 16 minutes. And that road crashes are the biggest killer of 15 to 25 year olds. Since the first ever car victim was killed in 1896, over 30 million individuals have been killed on the world’s roads and countless millions more have been maimed.

World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims was initiated by RoadPeace in 1993. In November, we remember of course most famously those killed in wars. But it’s important to remember those killed in ‘peacetime’ too. Because over the last half-century, a quarter of a million people have been killed in road crashes in Britain alone. Let’s work to bring about a society less dependent upon road travel, and to bring about slower travel on those roads, so that we can bring true peace to our land. For those of us who have been badly affected by car-nage on our roads know that there will be no true peace until there is road-peace.

GREENS STAND UP FOR REGIONAL ITV – Well known presenters to be dropped at Anglia TV [Media Release]

As feared, ITV is to carry out major cuts in regional news across the UK, with mergers of outlets and over 400 jobs going. There will be 30 staff losses in news and politics at Anglia TV, including many well known presenters (1).
Strong statements have been issued by current and past staff at Anglia and the local NUJ. Eastern Region Green Party shares those concerns.
Prospective Green MEP, Councillor Rupert Read said:
“ITV has been reducing its local news focus enormously since the Conservatives passed the 1990 Act, paving the way for deregulation of the industry and making ITV a business dependent on shareholder profit instead of a protected localised service and alternative to the BBC.
And now ITV has announced a further downscaling. This is a regressive step and further jeopardises ITV’s role as an important local news outlet.
There is a greater, not lesser, need for regional media in today’s 24 hour news world. Local news, like Anglia News, scrutinises local and regional politicians and political bodies and covers regional issues in a way that national organisations can’t. People value their local news and often have a higher level of trust in local news output than they do with elements of the national media.
Local news and current affairs coverage on Anglia should not be cut back. That is why I’m backing the NUJ’s campaign against the ITV cuts and have signed the NUJ’s petition to No.10 on this issue. (2)”
Notes for editors:
(1) Eastern Daily Press 26th November 2008


And here is the earlier piece that was carried on the Press Association, about the same matter:

ITV has been warned against massive job cuts of journalists

ITV warned on ‘regressive’ job cuts

Nov 8, 2008

ITV has been warned that it was heading down a “dangerous road” by deciding to shed hundreds of regional journalists.

The Green Party said ITV’s intention to cut more than 400 editorial jobs from local news programmes was a “regressive step for the fourth estate”.

Rupert Read, Green Party Lead Euro candidate for the Eastern region, said ITV was becoming dependent on shareholder profit instead of providing local communities with an option to the BBC.

“It is a dangerous road to be on,” he said. “This is a dangerously regressive step for the fourth estate, and further jeopardises ITV’s role as an important local news outlet.

“There is a greater, not lesser, need for regional media in today’s 24 hour news world.

“Local news, like Anglia News, scrutinises local and regional politicians and political bodies and covers regional issues in a way that national organisations can’t.

“Anglia News is an absolutely invaluable part of the broadcasting world, here in the East – our public life would be much worse off without it or with the scaled down regional news provision that is proposed.”

My recent visit to Brussels

I travelled recently (see pic in post a little below!) to Brussels at the invitation of Green Party MEPs Caroline Lucas, Leader of the England and Wales Green Party, and Jean Lambert, Green Party MEP for London. Along with lead candidates from the Greens’ other target Regions and with my candidate from Eastern Region (Peter Lynn of Colchester), I toured the European Parliament, meeting key officials, and taking part in a conference on climate justice. The conference also featured Lord Stern, author of the influential Stern Review on the economics of climate change, and Pascal Lamy, Director General of the World Trade Organisation.

The aim of the day was to prepare we Green candidates to take up office and become effective MEPs after next June’s elections.

We want to be ready to become MEPs and to be able to make a difference from day one following the election. With the electoral system being proportional, just 10% of the vote here in the East would be enough to get me elected to the European Parliament (see the post on the Tactical case for voting Green, below…).So, we have a great opportunity to add to the number of Green MEPs next June, especially here in Eastern Region where we are doing so well, and we want to make the most of that opportunity.

Our current Green Party MEPs do a fantastic job and are amongst the most hard-working of all MEPs, as I clearly saw during my visit.We need more MEPs of that kind, who will relentlessly stand up for the right to a good quality of life – for both current and future generations, rather than pandering to big business and financial institutions. Honesty, energy and commitment is what voters will get if they vote Green next July.

All we Green Party candidates of course travelled to Brussels by train.

The tactical case for voting Green at the Euros

Memo to progressives: The case for voting Green at the Euros

Last week, alongside Caroline Lucas MEP, our Party’s recently-elected first-ever Leader, I helped launch the Green Party’s European election campaign, and spoke with the nation’s media about our plan for a ‘Green New Deal‘ to get Britain and Europe out of the dreadful economic and environmental crisis that we have got ourselves into, as a society. Victories at the Euro-elections next June for the Green Party will make it more likely that this Green New Deal will happen. I want to be in Brussels, giving more power to Caroline’s arm, helping make this historic and sorely-needed change really start to happen all across the E.U.

I’m the lead candidate for Eastern Region, one of our two top target Regions (the other being NorthWest) for the Euro-elections.

Now led me add to this a tactical consideration: the electoral system that the Euro-elections are fought under; the arithmetic. In particular, we have to look carefully at where the large UKIP vote in 2004 will go to. If their collapse to less than 2% in this year’s London Assembly elections is anything to go by, the biggest chunk is set to return to a more Eurosceptic Tory party, but the BNP are actively courting disaffected UKIP activists and voters (to observe them in action look at democracy forum).

The financial crisis and the underlying ecological crisis, combined with the huge electoral problems facing UKIP (not to mention Labour) mean that there is all to play for in the June ’09 Euro-elections. And the way in which the tactical arithmetic breaks should be of serious interest to all readers of this site…

If we look at Eastern Region first… Last time around, in June ’04, the Tories won 3 seats, UKIP 2, Labour and the LibDems each 1. Even if they have a very good election UKIP are extremely likely to lose one of their two seats next June– they are short of money, completely internally-riven, bereft of Kilroy-Silk, and beset by corruption scandals. They will lose the seat in question either to the Tories (who might be able to advance to having 4 seats, if they have a very good election); or, conceivably, to the BNP (who claim to be targeting the Region); or to us. There is pretty much zero chance of Labour or the LibDems gaining a seat: can you really imagine either of those Parties gaining a substantial number (in the LibDems’ case, several tens of thousands) of votes relative to what they got last time around? Are they more popular than they were in 2004?!

So those are the options: either the Tories or just possibly the BNP gain in Eastern, or (just possibly) the UKIP holds onto one seat — or the Greens make a gain. In the battle for that final seat, we are the only progressive option capable of stopping the right-wing candidate at next June’s Euro-elections, here in Eastern. About 10% of the vote in Eastern would likely be enough to displace that second UKIP MEP with a Green, rather than a Tory (or a fascist). We already have 26 Councillors in this Region, and our vote in the local elections in Eastern Region is running at the 10% level – and that is under first past the post.

The slightly larger North West region also deserves close scrutiny. In 2004 the BNP polled just over 6% and the Greens just under. The Kilroy-Silk surge propelled UKIP ahead of both, leading to a result where 3 Labour, 3 Tory, 2 Lib Dem and 1 UKIP members got elected. The region is now down to 8 seats like London: which means around 8 to 9% of the vote will be enough to gain the final seat. A 4th placed party gaining that share of the vote will certainly win a seat, but a 5th placed party finishing just behind them will be left out in the cold. When we talk about stark choices, they don’t come much clearer than this. Assuming that UKIP lose their NW seat, a very small number of votes will likely make the difference between and fascist or a Green being elected, in NorthWest.

Make no mistake that the North West region is the principal target for the BNP. Nick Griffin, their Chairman, is the lead candidate. His ambition for far right politics in the UK is modelled on the successful personality cults developed by Jean Marie Le Pen and Jorg Haider. His election as a Euro MP will give him the profile (and taxpayer-funded salary) he craves. We’ve seen Le Pen get to the second round of the French presidential elections and Haider force his way into Austrian government. There is no reason to assume that an organised and electorally-established BNP couldn’t in due course do the same. The flip side for Griffin is that a failure to win a seat this time would almost certainly spell the end of his political career, if the recent internal discord and infighting in the BNP is anything to go by.

The Greens have established a group on Liverpool City Council, recently gained 5 more councillors in Lancaster and have active parish and town councillors around the region. What we can expect that the BNP vote will grow sufficiently to put them into the “grey” area where they may or may not win a seat; as might we.

My friend Peter Cranie, the lead candidate for the Greens, is from an anti-fascist campaigning background, and has been highly active in the Merseyside Coalition Against Racism and Fascism (MCARF), who have been largely successful in preventing the BNP getting any sort of electoral foothold in that area of the North West. He is candid about the most detailed Total Politics poll of marginals, and the barometer it gives for next year’s contest. I very much hope that it will be Peter, and not Nick Griffin, joining me in the European Parliament…

The Euro-elections are ‘traditionally’ our best election: in 1989, we scored 15% nationwide; in 1999, we got our first two MEPs elected; in 2009, with Caroline Lucas MEP as our inaugural Party Leader, we are aiming to at least double our numbers of MEPs.

To end where I began: Britain and Europe desperately need a ‘Green New Deal’, a 21st century version of what Roosevelt’s Democrats gave the United States, the last time that there was a truly enormous stock market crash and banking crash. Now is the perfect time for a response – to the financial storm and to the underlying resource crunch (the age of cheap plentiful oil is coming to an end) and to the pollution crisis (climate chaos, the ultimate literal storm) – that will actually work. A Green response: a Green New Deal, creating hundreds of thousands of good green jobs, and stabilising our economy. And voters will have the perfect opportunity to vote for this, on June 4 of next year.

You can play a significant role in preventing the rise of rabid anti-Europeanism and outright racism, in British and European politics, over the next 7 months. Those of you who would normally vote Labour or Lib Dem in London, the South East, the North West and Eastern region know that you will get at least one representative from your own party of choice in each of these Euro regions. So my appeal to you is to consider the wider implication, which is the direction UK politics takes over the next few years in a tough economic climate, well suited possibly to the growth of the far right.

As little as 1 or 2% of the electorate switching from Labour or the Lib Dems to the Greens makes clear sense to me if it stops the BNP, and yes, we are being candid about this because the Greens will benefit electorally with a big enough tactical vote. Discussion on this topic needs to be frank and honest. I’d recommend that if you want to investigate further, look at the D’Hondt calculator, punch in the London Assembly results for a 7 or 8 seat region and see why even 0.1% matters. When you’ve finished doing the calculations, you might also want to read Raphael Behr‘s take on things.